Seems like does not have onchain identity. Will be Voting NAY due to this.

I think it should be a trustworthy identity, as explained in the response to comment one. But for the same reason as comment one, to reduce communication costs, vote against and urge improvement.

Before [#63](https://hydration.subsquare.io/referenda/63) can be enacted I have sent Bifrost funds to cover initial 2 weeks of oracle updates in this [transaction](https://hydration.subscan.io/extrinsic/7343102-2) directly.
This amount will end up back in treasury as Bifrost is using it to cover XCM fees.
I ask for refund to my account in this proposal.

amount

beneficiary

Executed

Submitted

DecisionDepositPlaced

DecisionStarted

ConfirmStarted

Confirmed

tipper

Refund cost of 2 weeks of vDOT oracle updates

root

whitelisted_caller

referendum_canceller

referendum_killer

general_admin

treasurer

spender

omnipool_admin

economic_parameters

Origin able to dispatch a whitelisted call.

 Origin for spending very high amounts of HDX(<= 50M HDX) from the treasury as well as generally administering it.

Origin able to spend up to 2,222,222 HDX from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend up to 50K HDX from the treasury at once.

Origin able to perform specific Omnipool-related actions.