Nay from me. I have tried to explain my thinking as simply and concisely as possible below.

iℏ ∂Ψ(r,t)/∂t = [−ℏ²/2m ∇² + V(r,t)]Ψ(r,t) = e^(iπ) + 1 = 0 = f(a) = (1/2πi) ∮ f(z)/(z−a) dz = R_μν − ½R g_μν + Λg_μν = 8πG/c⁴ T_μν = ρ(∂v/∂t + (v·∇)v) = −∇p + μ∇²v + f = ζ(s) = Σ(1/n^s) = Π(1 − 1/p^s)^(−1)!! 

Thanks

[@Wally Wallet](16Zha82mt52199sVctZ8hEh9sBqGgdNDHgft8GEeFfwy4Amf-hydradx) Appreciate the comment. Given the weight of your Nay vote, could you please share the fuller reasoning behind it? I think many people across both the Pendulum and Hydration communities would value a more detailed explanation, so we can better understand the concerns and discuss them constructively.

remark

Deciding

Submitted

DecisionStarted

DecisionDepositPlaced

omnipool_admin

root

whitelisted_caller

referendum_canceller

referendum_killer

general_admin

treasurer

spender

tipper

economic_parameters

Origin able to dispatch a whitelisted call.

 Origin for spending very high amounts of HDX(<= 50M HDX) from the treasury as well as generally administering it.

Origin able to spend up to 2,222,222 HDX from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend up to 50K HDX from the treasury at once.

Origin able to perform specific Omnipool-related actions.

[Omnipool Admin] Referendum #331